Return Home















 

Dealing Dogs


Research dogs awaiting their fate

Vivisection is the practice of cutting into or using invasive techniques on live animals. The term is derived from the Latin word vivus, which means alive. Vivisection is commonly called animal experimentation and includes the use of animals for research, product testing and in education.

Animal experimentation is conducted in a wide range of environments, including universities, hospitals, research institutes, independent laboratories that conduct research for corporations, military bases, and agricultural facilities.

In 2004, the USDA reported a total of 88,572 dogs and cats were used in research in the United States.

Dogs and primates are commonly used in toxicity testing, brain research, dental research, heart and lung research and surgical experiments. Because of their compact size and friendly temperament, the beagle has been one of the most popular dog breeds to be used in medical research.

  
Beagles used in smoking/inhalation tests.

Cats are commonly used in experiments involving experimental neurology, some aspects of ophthalmology, retrovirus research, inherited diseases and immunodeficiency diseases.

  
Unfortunate victims of medical research

There are three categories of research animals -- purpose bred, random source and conditioned.

Purpose bred animals are bred specifically for research and obtained from Class “A” dealers who raise all their animals in a closed colony on their own premises. Researchers claim that the “advantages” of using purpose bred animals include: more uniform genetic control, fewer health problems, excellent vaccination histories, animals free of common diseases and parasites, and animals accustomed to cage life. Adversely, purpose bred dogs are more expensive and they lack the proper socialization necessary for research.

Random source animals are not specifically bred for research and are purchased from pounds, Class “B” dealers or donated to research. Random source animals come from a random genetic pool; that is, they have not come from controlled in-breeding. Researchers in the area of organ and cell transplantation, for example, prefer the use of "randomly outbred" animals. Randomly outbred animals, the type most commonly found in pounds and acquired through “B” dealers, have widely divergent genetic backgrounds.

Conditioned animals are purpose bred and random source animals that have been quarantined, vaccinated, and determined free of parasites and any other medical or biological anomaly.
 

Research Facilities Continued to Buy Dogs from Baird

Once news of the August 2003 raid spread, Baird lost many of his clients. However, the University of Missouri-Columbia (Mizzou) continued to buy dogs from Baird until December 2004, a month before his settlement was finalized. The school said it was waiting for a final finding. "We want to make sure due process is given its full cycle," university spokesman Christian Basi explained. "We had no hard evidence, no solid evidence that anything was wrong." Mizzou says it stands by its decision to continue buying from Baird.

In general, facilities continue to purchase and use random source animals because they can. In many instances, random source dogs are considerably cheaper than purpose bred dogs and have much better temperaments. Animals that have been around people are usually more friendly and easy-going.

Alternatives to Animals in Medical Research

The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the Consumer Product Safety Commission do not require that pharmaceuticals, cosmetics or other household products be tested on animals. However, the Food and Drug Administration regulations do require that all new drugs undergo animal tests before they can proceed to clinical (human) trials. This does not mean that information gathered in animal experiments has any predictive value.

There are many precise, cost-effective and humane ways to answer human health questions and conduct scientific research. Alternatives to using animals in research include epidemiological studies (studies of human populations), clinical research, in vitro (test tube) research, computer technologies such as simulators and imaging techniques and replacing animals with human cells in safety tests.

a) Epidemiological and Clinical Studies
Studies of human populations have provided important information about the causes of many diseases, such as the relationships between cholesterol and heart disease, the mechanism of transmission of HIV and chemical exposures and birth defects.
Scientists can “see” abnormalities -- and track treatment progress -- in the brains of victims of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases, schizophrenia, epilepsy and brain injury using sophisticated scanning technologies (CT, PET and MRI). All drugs must undergo clinical testing before becoming approved; carefully crafted clinical research is the best way to determine human reactions to new drugs.

b) In Vitro Research
An enormous amount of valuable in vitro (test tube) research is conducted today. The National Disease Research Interchange provides more than 130 kinds of human tissue to scientists investigating more than 50 diseases, including cancer, diabetes and glaucoma. Cell and tissue cultures are used to screen new therapies and to test for product safety. Genetic micro arrays are being used to predict liver toxicity by measuring gene expression in human liver cells.


In Vitro research is a popular
alternative to animals

c) In Silico (Computer) Technologies
Computers can often predict the toxicity of chemicals, including their potential to cause cancer or birth defects, based on their molecular structure. Computer simulations can also predict the metabolism and distribution of chemicals in human tissues.

d) Safety Testing
Safety tests using human cells are more accurate than animal tests. In the Multicenter Evaluation of In Vitro Cytotoxicity tests (MEIC), researchers evaluated 68 different methods to predict the toxicity of 50 different chemicals. Rat LD50 tests -- lethal dose tests currently used -- were only 59 percent accurate, but a combined human cell test was 83 percent accurate in predicting actual human toxicity.


Human tissue is more reliable
than animal tissue

Pharmagene Laboratories conducts new drug development exclusively using human tissues and computer technologies. With tools from molecular biology and biochemistry, Pharmagene investigates how new drugs affect the actions of human genes or the proteins they make. These techniques replace animal tests in many cases.

Keep family pets out of research labs! Click HERE to support the Pet Safety and Protection Act!


To find out which companies test cosmetic, personal care and household products on animals, visit the Caring Consumer Web site at www.CaringConsumer.com.
 


For more information on the use of animals in research, visit:
www.pcrm.org
www.navs.org

 


Privacy | Contact Us | Legal Info